Current pattern of antibiotics prescription to prevent surgical site infection after lower third molar removal

نویسنده

  • Carlos F Santos
چکیده

Current pattern of antibiotics prescription to prevent surgical site infection after lower third molar removal Literature contains arguments for and against the use of routine antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery involving bone removal to prevent surgical site infection, and the main source of controversy is the lack of reliable and sensitive clinical criteria for identifying postoperative infection in these patients 2. Peterson's criterion for antibiotic use is that the surgical procedure should have a significant risk of infection 4. Dentoalveolar surgery has a less than 5% infection rate 3. Undoubtedly, amoxicillin, like every other antibiotic, has no direct influence on the control of pain, swelling or postoperative trismus, but it seems that preventing postoperative infection may have an indirect influence on these parameters. Operative field infection in this area may lead to transmission of the infection to the submandibular space leading to the inflammatory infiltration of an attachment of the masseter and the medial pterygoid, which leads to trismus. Similarly, perimandibular inflammatory infiltration associated with bacterial infection during surgery may also contribute to the appearance of swelling. Reports have documented that specific postoperative oral prophylactic treatment for the removal of lower third molars does not contribute to better wound healing, less pain or increased mouth opening 1-3,5,6. Lawler, et al. 3 (2005) stated that " the author's institution ceased using antibiotic prophylaxis for routine third molar removal approximately a decade ago. There has been no change in the infection rate with or without prophylactic antibiotics. " The professional should always balance the low risk of wound infection against the adverse risk from the antibiotic. Some factors which need to be considered are the tissue trauma, the extent of host compromise, difficult bone impactions with previous history of recurrent infections and other medical comorbidities, for example. In the few cases where antibiotic prophylaxis is considered, a single high preoperative dose should be given (amoxicillin 2 g or clindamycin 600 mg for patients allergic to penicillin, 1 hour prior to the procedure) 3. antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary during operations to remove third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. In press 2006. The value of routine antibiotic prophylaxis in mandibular third molar surgery: acute-phase protein levels as indicators of infection. 4-Peterson LJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infections in oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6-Zeitler DL. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery: a dissenting opinion.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Postoperative infection after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: an analysis of 110 consecutive procedures.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of postoperative infection and other complications after the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS Medical records of 110 consecutive patients with 130 consecutive surgical extractions of impacted lower third molar teeth performed under local anesthetic using strict aseptic techniques were reviewed...

متن کامل

Comparison of the effects of administration and non-administration of antibiotics on post-surgical complications of impacted wisdom teeth

Background and Aims: Some of the post-operative complications of impacted third molar surgery, one of the most prevalent surgeries in oral field, are known to be infection, erythema, trismus and pain. Antibiotic prescription to prevent post-operative infection under some particular circumstances, is acceptable but under debate considering their disadvantages. In the present study, we examined t...

متن کامل

Impacted mandibular third molars:

Introduction: There are dissenting opinions regarding the efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial agents in third molar surgery. Objective: To determine: 1) The efficacy of a prophylactic antibiotic regimen compared with a chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing postoperative infections in mandibular third molar surgery. 2) The pattern of presentation and the indications for extraction of mandibular...

متن کامل

مقایسه سفازولین تنها و همراه با جنتامایسین در پیشگیری از عفونت محل جراحی در بیماران تحت عمل جراحی پیوند عروق کرونر

Background and purpose: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the third leading cause of hospital infections which results in increased morbidity, mortality and costs after cardiac surgery. The importance of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgery has been proved. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare two prophylactic antibiotic regimens (cefazolin and cefazolin plus gentamici...

متن کامل

Survey of Spanish dentists on the prescription of antibiotics and antiseptics in surgery for impacted lower third molars

BACKGROUND This study explored the attitude of registered dentists in Biscay towards prescribing antibiotics and/or antiseptics to prevent potential infections after surgical extraction of completely bone-impacted third molars in otherwise healthy individuals, with no history of infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD We sent letters to 931 registered dentists in Biscay, with an explanation of the stu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 15  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007